Check out this lawsuit, what do you guys think about this?:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
——————————————————————–X
MARKUS KLINKO and MARKUS KLINKO
Index No.
PHOTOGRAPHY, INC., d/b/a MARKUS KLINKO & INDRANI PHOTOGRAPHY,
V
ERIFIED COMPLAINT
Plaintiff,
-against-
ROCK & REPUBLIC ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a ROCK & REPUBLIC JEANS and
MICHAEL BALL, individually,
Defendants.
———————————————————————X
Plaintiffs MARKUS KLINKO and MARKUS KLINKO PHOTOGRAPHY, INC.,
d/b/a MARKUS KLINKO & INDRANI PHOTOGRAPHY, by and through their
attorneys,
MELTZER LoPRESTI, LLP, as and for their complaint against Defendants
ROCK &
REPUBLIC ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a ROCK & REPUBLIC JEANS and MICHAEL
BALL, allege as follows:
NATURE OF ACTION
1. This action responds to a pattern of threats and extortion
perpetrated by defendant
Michael Ball (ìBallî), the CEO, founder and head designer for
defendant Rock & Republic
Enterprises, Inc. (ìRock & Republicî), a manufacturer of fashionable
denim jeans under the
brand name ìRock & Republicî.
2. Fueled by jealousies over an ex-fiancÈ that abandoned Ball and who
subsequently
entered into a long term romantic relationship with plaintiff Markus
Klinko (ìKlinkoî), and
seeking to protect himself from potentially damaging information
regarding his past, Ball
embarked on a crusade to intimidate Klinko personally and
professionally. Upon obtaining
possession of intimate e-mails and sexually explicit photos exchanged
by Klinko and BallÃs exfiancÈ,
Ball proceeded to threaten Klinko to ìwalk awayî from his ex-lover
and any monies
owed to plaintiffs, because if he didnÃt, Ball would use his ìpower
and influenceî in the fashion
industry, as well as the photos and e-mails, to publicly embarrass
and ruin Klinko personally and
professionally. BallÃs threat: ìyou donÃt want to fuck with meî.
3. In December 2006, Klinko, together with his business partner
Indrani Pal-
Chaudhuri (ìIndraniî) and their studio, Markus Klinko & Indrani
Photography (ìMKIPî), had
originally been hired by defendant Rock & Republic to shoot an
international advertising
campaign for their brand.
4. Klinko, a highly successful, internationally acclaimed, fashion/
celebrity
photographer who has become well known for his work with A-list
actors, musicians and models
in the entertainment industry such as Jennifer Lopez, Britney Spears,
Mariah Carey, Janet
Jackson, Beyonce, Lindsay Lohan and David Bowie, among many others,
as well as for his work
in major advertising campaigns and fashion magazines, was introduced
to Ball by BallÃs exfiancÈ
while she was in a romantic relationship with Klinko. However, upon
information and
belief, Ball was unaware of this relationship.
5. Thereafter, despite being admittedly extremely pleased by Klinko
and MKIPÃs
work and the obvious success of the photo shoot, instead, Ball later
sought to humiliate and
embarrass Klinko and MKIP by making unreasonable and nonsensical
demands. Ball followed
by then refusing to use any of plaintiffsà images, by refusing to use
Klinko and MKIP in any
further ad campaigns (as defendants had promised), and by refusing to
compensate plaintiffs
without any viable reason.
6. One week later, upon coming into possession of the aforesaid
sexually explicit
images and personal e-mails, Ball then proceeded to threaten Klinko,
claiming to be a ìbig shotî
in the industry (ìdo you know who I amî), and that Klinko would be
embarrassed, humiliated
and professionally ruined by this personal information and the
release of the photos if he didnÃt
simply ìwalk awayî from any of his claims against defendants or his
former lover, repeatedly
intimidating Klinko with such statements as ìdonÃt fuck with me or
youÃll regret itî, ìyou donÃt
want to fuck with meî and ìlet it go, or elseî.
7. At that time, BallÃs threats also included him assisting in the
filing of a
harassment claim against Klinko with local police and spending
whatever money it took for his
attorneys to pursue Klinko through representation of his ex-fiancÈ.
8. As alleged herein, in conjunction with the making of such threats,
Ball feigned the
act of ìprotectingî his former lover as if a ìknight in shining
armorî, while portraying Klinko as
a disgruntled boyfriend. However, numerous e-mails and communications
between both Klinko
and BallÃs ex-fiancÈ subsequent to their separation and prior to
BallÃs threats, belie such a
characterization. Rather, these communications support plaintiffsÃ
claims of BallÃs jealous and
vindictive motivation, as they detail numerous times a loving desire
by BallÃs ex-fiancÈ to
continue to remain in a relationship with Klinko, or in the least to
remain in communication with
him. In an e-mail to Klinko dated December 28, 2006, she elaborated:
ìListen [ ]now that you
met Michael you can understand why I got so traumatized.î
9. Defendant Ball has continued to act in bad faith through such
threats, and has
benefited by improperly retaining the fruits of plaintiffsà labor, by
preventing plaintiffs from
recovering what is rightfully theirs, by use of threats intended to
destroy KlinkoÃs personal life
and professional career and to embarrass and severely injure
plaintiffsà reputation and financial
interests. Threats of ruining someoneÃs career through extortion and
blackmail should not be
tolerated – and resorting to bully tactics in avoidance of proper
resolution through the judicial
system is simply unacceptable.
THE PARTIES
10. Plaintiff Markus Klinko (ìKlinkoî), is an individual and resident
of New York
County. Klinko is an internationally known, high-end fashion/
celebrity photographer, catering to
numerous well-known actors, musicians and models in the entertainment
industry, as well as
international advertising campaigns and magazines.
11. Plaintiff Markus Klinko Photography, Inc., d/b/a Markus Klinko &
Indrani
Photography (ìMKIPî), is a corporation duly organized under the laws
of the State of New
York, and maintains a principal place of business in the City, County
and State of New York.
MKIP is in the business of photographic and imaging services.
12. Upon information and belief, defendant Rock & Republic
Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a
Rock & Republic Jean (ìRock & Republicî), is a corporation organized
under the laws of the
State of California, with a principal office located at 3525 Eastham
Drive, Culver City,
California 90232. Rock & Republic is a manufacturer of, among other
things, denim jeans,
which are sold in New York.
13. Upon information and belief, Michael Ball (ìBallî), is a resident
of the State of
California and is the CEO and founder of defendant Rock & Republic.
VENUE
14. In accordance with Rule 503(a) of the New York Civil Practice Law
and Rules,
venue is appropriate in this Court.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
15. Plaintiffs maintain a well-known business in photography and
photographic
imaging, catering to a high-end fashion/celebrity clientele of
actors, musicians and models in the
entertainment industry, also creating images seen in international
advertising campaigns and
magazines.
16. Defendants Ball and Rock & Republic represent the brand ìRock &
Republicî, a
clothing line that primarily features fashionable denim jeans.
17. On or about November 22, 2006, defendants sought a high-end
photographer to
shoot their major advertising campaign for Spring 2007, to be
revealed at Fashion Week in New
York, February 2007.
18. At that time, defendant Klinko was romantically involved with
Fernanda Romero
(ìRomeroî), a soap opera actress and aspiring model. Romero
introduced Klinko to Ball, in an
apparent attempt to garner a position as featured model in the Rock &
Republic campaign.
19. Several years earlier, defendant Ball had been romantically
involved with
Romero, and had even proposed to her. The couple subsequently became
engaged.
20. Upon information and belief, after a tumultuous relationship in
which Ball had
several violent incidences with Romero, Romero left Ball and ended
the relationship.
21. Upon information and belief, at various times during 2005, Ball
assisted and/or
aided Romero in procuring a fraudulent marriage for immigration
purposes, and also assisted and
advised Romero in obtaining a false social security identification
card while utilizing two
different social security numbers.
22. In about January, 2006, Romero became romantically involved with
plaintiff
Klinko. Upon information and belief, this occurred despite BallÃs
attempts to woo Romero back
by buying her a new car during that same time.
23. During Romero and KlinkoÃs relationship, Romero would often
reveal to Klinko
highly confidential and intimate details about her relationship with
Ball, and at times she would
even broadcast phone conversations with Ball via speakerphone or by
placing the phone at full
volume.
24. On numerous occasions, Romero referred to sensitive matters
regarding their
prior relationship, such as instances of violence by Ball leading to
police involvement and
RomeroÃs complaints to the police, immigration fraud and his
complicity in her fraudulent
marriage and the procurement of false social security numbers, tapes
of their therapy sessions
and conversations regarding his sexuality.
25. Upon information and belief, KlinkoÃs acquired knowledge of such
accounts was
the partial motivation for Ball to eventually seek to silence and
extort Klinko.
26. In about November 2006, Romero introduced Klinko to Ball in an
apparent effort
to be featured in the Rock & Republic advertising campaign.
27. Upon information and belief, until that time, Romero had never
told Ball that she
was involved with Klinko for fear of not being awarded a model
contract with Rock & Republic.
28. Upon meeting, Ball represented that since defendants had
partnered with and/or
been involved in major campaigns with celebrity personalities such as Victoria Beckham (ìPosh
Spiceî) and plans to feature Jessica Alba in an upcoming fashion
season, plaintiffs would
benefit from the added exposure of a full advertising campaign with
the Rock & Republic
brand.1
29. As defendants were aware, Klinko and MKIP demand a superior ìday
rateî in the
industry due to their status and impressive client roster.
Plaintiffsà images are known worldwide,
as they have produced many instantly recognizable photographs for A-
list celebrities, musicians
and models in the entertainment industry, such as Jennifer Lopez,
Britney Spears, Mariah Carey, Beyonce, Lindsay Lohan, Mary J. Blige, Kate Winslet, Keanu Reeves,
David Bowie, among
others, as well as major advertising campaigns for highly visible
clients such as L’Oreal Paris,
Pepsi, Hugo Boss, Nike, Elizabeth Arden, Baby Phat, and many others.
Such images have also
appeared in well-known magazines such as Vanity Fair, V, GQ,
Interview, Arena and Playboy,
among others. (See http://www.markusklinko-indrani.com/photoGallery/ )
30. On or about December 5, 2006, the parties agreed that plaintiffs
would be retained
by defendants in relation to the advertising campaign for defendantsÃ
brand ìRock & Republicî
(hereinafter, ìthe Workî), on the following terms: (i) plaintiffs
would be guaranteed ìon page ad
creditî for their work; and (ii) plaintiffs were to be granted
exclusive rights to shoot future
campaigns for the brand. In return, plaintiffs agreed to: (a) waive
their session fee (which
consisted of a day rate of $ 30,000.00); (b) grant international
usage of images produced for one
year (valued at $ 30,000.00); and (c) provide digital post production
services at cost. Attached as
Exhibit ìAî is the partiesà agreement. As is standard, up front
expenses of the photo shoot were
to be paid prior to the shoot.
31. At this time, by the explicit instruction of Ball, Romero was not
to be used in the
1 Unknown to Klinko, defendants and Victoria Beckham had parted ways,
and upon
photo shoot because ìshe cheated on meî, as Ball stated before both
his and plaintiffsà staff.
32. Pursuant to said agreement, on about December 14, 2007,
plaintiffs duly
performed the required services in connection with the Work.
33. The photo shoot was a great success, and defendant Ball openly
praised the
plaintiffsà work, which he also declared on camera in a video
produced for the campaign. As
stated by Ball:
ìI just wanted to say working with Markus and Indrani was
amazing . . . they’re
the future of fashion, I mean I’m really stoked as a young company to
be working
with them and I think this is the beginning of greatness . . .
honestly. It was quite
a shoot, and . . . you guys will see it, it’ll be on the pages, of
March . . .
I’d be honest I look forward to work with them again and again. I
mean honestly .
. . this is a relationship and a partnership that is going to create
some really
amazing, amazing things, and I look forward to it. It’s going to be
really fucking
cool . . .î.
34. By about December 21, 2007, plaintiffs had already prepared seven
(7) composed
ad proposals for presentation to defendants.
35. On that date, following plaintiffsà submission of images for
consideration,
defendant Ball suddenly contacted plaintiffs and for no reason,
demanded that plaintiffs
immediately turn over all images taken – even test images. Such a
demand under these
circumstances is unheard of and is not standard in the industry.
36. Despite BallÃs unreasonable demand, plaintiffs additionally
provided several
dozen images to defendants on December 22 and December 29, 2006.
37. At this time, plaintiffs further explained that the edited
selection of images was
ready for review, however, defendant Ball simply refused to
communicate at all with plaintiffs
information and belief, has recently sued defendants.
about the proposed image selection.
38. Thereafter, defendants notified plaintiffsà agent that they were
not only refusing to
use any of plaintiffsà images, but were refusing to use Klinko and
MKIP in any further ad
campaigns (as promised).
39. Defendants also notified plaintiffsà agent and Klinko directly
that they were
refusing to compensate plaintiffs at all, without any viable reason.
40. Upon information and belief, on or about January 15, 2007,
defendant Ball came
into possession and/or viewed highly personal, sexually explicit
photos and e-mails, shared
between Klinko and Romero.
41. On January 18, 2007, defendant Ball contacted KlinkoÃs attorney
by telephone,
stating he had viewed the sexually explicit photographs and e-mails.
42. In that conversation, Ball threatened that if Klinko contacted or
pursued Romero
any further, KlinkoÃs reputation would be damaged by the exposure of
such information.
43. On about January 21, 2007, Klinko contacted Ball by telephone,
whereupon Ball
proceeded to threaten Klinko that if he did not ìback offî and simply
ìwalk awayî from any
claims he had against defendants or Romero, Ball would expend all of
his power and influence to
embarrass, humiliate and professionally ruin Klinko by exposure of
this personal information.
44. On that phone conversation, defendant Ball repeatedly threatened
and intimidated
Klinko with statements such as ìdonÃt fuck with me or youÃll regret
itî, ìlet it go, or elseî, ìyou
donÃt want to fuck with meî and ìdonÃt fuck with me on a personal
levelî.
45. BallÃs threats also included that he would assist Romero in
filing a bogus
harassment claim with local police and spend ìany amount of moneyî on
attorneys for Romero
to pursue Klinko, in addition to causing crippling financial loss to
plaintiffs.
46. On that phone conversation, Ball threatened and intimated that if
Klinko did not
ìback offî and ìwalk awayî, he would use all of his influence and
connections in the industry to
prevent Klinko and MKIP from earning money with other clients, and
would openly and publicly
refuse to use plaintiffsà work, thus causing further embarrassment
and humiliation.
47. On that phone conversation, Ball also threatened to force Klinko
to expend great
sums of money via legal battles and attorneysà fees, that would
essentially put Klinko out of
business.
48. In conjunction with making such threats, Ball feigned the act of
ìprotectingî
Romero. However, upon information and belief, Ball is simply
protecting his own interests and
using the opportunity of RomeroÃs romantic relationship with Klinko,
and the sexually explicit
photos and personal e-mails, to avoid his own liability and to strike
out maliciously against
Klinko.
49. Upon communicating with defendant Ball on January 21, 2007, and
in fear and
apprehension over the aforesaid threats received from Ball, Klinko
decided to forgo pursing Ball,
Rock & Republic and/or Romero for monies owed and services performed.
AS AND FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
AGAINST MICHAEL BALL
(Extortion)
50. Plaintiffs incorporate paragraphs ì1î through ì49î, above by
reference.
51. That defendant Ball did threaten and intimidate plaintiff Klinko
that if he did not
relinquish his rights to property, namely money plaintiffs are
entitled to, and if Klinko did not
cease all communications with Romero, he would expose personal
documents and photographs
and publicize the same, subjecting Klinko to contempt, ridicule or
embarrassment.
52. That defendant Ball did threaten and intimidate plaintiff Klinko
that if he did not
relinquish his rights to property, namely money plaintiffs are
entitled to, and if Klinko did not
cease all communications with Romero, he would assist in accusing
Klinko of a crime and/or
cause criminal charges to be instituted against him.
53. That defendant Ball did threaten and intimidate plaintiff Klinko
that if he did not
relinquish his rights to property, namely money plaintiffs are
entitled to, and if Klinko did not
cease all communications with Romero, he would use his influence in
the fashion industry and
spend any amount of money to defame, bad mouth and harm Klinko
personally and
professionally, in the fashion and entertainment industry.
54. That such wrongful actions would cause serious injury to
plaintiffsà reputations
and business interests.
55. That by reason of defendant BallÃs threats, defendants improperly
obtained
property, namely, services, money and images to which they are not
entitled.
56. By reason of defendant BallÃs attempted extortion, plaintiffs are
entitled to
declaratory and injunctive relief as well as compensatory and
punitive damages in an amount to
be determined at trial.
AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
AGAINST MICHAEL BALL
(Tortious Interference with Prospective Business Relations)
57. Plaintiffs incorporate paragraphs ì1î through ì56î, above by
reference.
58. Plaintiffsà public image and relations with clients and
advertisers, agents, models,
make-up artists, hair stylists, and those employed in the
entertainment industry are crucial to
their business.
59. Defendant BallÃs wrongful actions, as described in the foregoing
paragraphs, and
which include the willful breach of the Rock & Republic advertising
campaign contract without
reason, exhibit an intentional, malicious and unjustified
interference with plaintiffsà current and
future business relations with said clients and advertisers, and
those employed in the
entertainment industry.
60. Defendant BallÃs actions, as described in the foregoing
paragraphs, were improper
and beyond the scope of his position as CEO of defendant Rock &
Republic, such that these
actions served to interfere with plaintiffsà current and future
business relations with Rock &
Republic.
61. Defendant BallÃs interference with plaintiffsà business relations
was undertaken
with the sole purpose of harassing plaintiffs and/or with dishonest,
unfair or improper means.
62. By reason of the foregoing, and as a direct and proximate result
of defendant
BallÃs conduct, plaintiffs are entitled to declaratory and injunctive
relief as well as compensatory
and punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial.
AS AND FOR A THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
AGAINST MICHAEL BALL
(Prima Facie Tort)
63. Plaintiffs incorporate paragraphs ì1î through ì62î, above by
reference.
64. Defendant BallÃs wrongful conduct was completely unjustified and
was intended
solely to inflict substantial harm against plaintiffs.
65. By reason of the foregoing, plaintiffs are entitled to
declaratory and injunctive
relief as well as compensatory and punitive damages in an amount to
be determined at trial.
AS AND FOR A FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
AGAINST MICHAEL BALL
(Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)
66. Plaintiffs incorporate paragraphs ì1î through ì65î, above by
reference.
67. Defendant BallÃs wrongful conduct, as described in the foregoing
paragraphs,
constitutes extreme and outrageous conduct and behavior.
68. Defendant Ball acted with malice, and with the intent to cause
severe emotional
distress to plaintiff Klinko and/or in deliberate disregard of the
high probability that severe
emotional distress to Klinko would result.
69. Defendant Ball has maliciously embarked on a course of conduct
intended to
cause Klinko to suffer mental and emotional distress, tension and
anxiety.
70. Plaintiff Klinko has suffered and will continue to suffer great
mental strain and
anguish and severe emotional distress.
71. By reason of the foregoing and as a direct and proximate result
of defendant
BallÃs conduct, plaintiff Klinko is entitled to compensatory and
punitive damages against
defendant Ball in an amount to be determined at trial.
AS AND FOR A FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION
AGAINST DEFENDANT ROCK & REPUBLIC
(Breach of Contract)
72. Plaintiffs incorporate paragraphs ì1î through ì71î, above by
reference.
73. To date, despite due demand, defendant Rock & Republic has
refused to pay
plaintiffs for their services.
74. That defendant has willfully breached its agreement with
plaintiffs by failing to
pay plaintiffs for their services duly rendered.
75. That defendant has willfully breached its agreement with
plaintiffs by refusing to
use plaintiffsà images and provide plaintiffs with credit
acknowledgment of the same.
76. That defendant has willfully breached its agreement with
plaintiffs by failing to
provide plaintiffs exclusivity for their services as ìpartnersî with
regard to future advertising
campaigns.
77. That as a result of defendantÃs breach of the partiesà agreement,
plaintiffs have
been damaged in a sum to be determined at trial, but believed to be
no less than Five Hundred
Thousand Dollars ($ 500,000.00).
AS AND FOR A SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION
AGAINST DEFENDANT ROCK & REPUBLIC
(Unjust Enrichment)
78. Plaintiffs incorporate paragraphs ì1î through ì77î, above by
reference.
79. Under the doctrine of quantum meruit, defendant Rock & Republic
has been
unjustly enriched by receiving the benefit of the services provided
by the plaintiffs in a sum to be
determined at trial, but believed to be an amount no less than Two
Hundred Thousand Dollars ($
200,000.00).
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand judgment against the Defendants as follows:
a. Declaring that the acts and practices complained of herein are in
violation of the
laws of the State of New York;
b. Enjoining and permanently restraining these violations;
c. Directing Defendants to pay compensatory and punitive damages to
Plaintiffs in
an amount to be proven at trial;
d. Awarding Plaintiffs costs, disbursements and reasonable attorneysÃ
fees; and
e. Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
Dated: New York, New York
January 23, 2007
Respectfully submitted,
MELTZER LoPRESTI, LLP
By: /s/ _________________________
Anthony A. LoPresti
30 Broad Street, 37th Floor
New York, New York 10004
(212) 425-0551
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
IT SEEMS THAT THE PHOTOGRAPHER MARKUS KLINKO IT’S OBSSESED WITH THIS GIRL AND HE IS SO F&%$@wING INSECURE!!!
MOVE ON MAN….
HE IS SO TALENTED AND IT’S A SHAME HE IS DOING THIS.
just get over it, it seems Mr Ball has this shit clocked so this guy sould back of and let it be. all this over some women. markus go home,and ball get new girl, she sound’s cheap anyway,give her the finger and buy a new one. thats my take on this, im out peace.
Not so sure, Miracle. I mean, think about it for just a minute.
A few short years from now, this guy will still bed a half a dozen 18 year old hotties every month. Wanna bet?
She (andy gayrumor-spreading fiona banana look alike..oooopss!!!) will have had their 5th lipo -sure it’s cheap in Tijuana!- and after 30, which is pretty soon cause 23 she ain’t (Caras check your facts!)it all
will smell like rotten fish. Actually it does already.
Greetings
Mari
wait a second! markus is soo gay!! i know my bf told me.
markus shoots all the music stuff and he has worked with
n sync and lance bass…no way he ever slept with a girl.
Who blames her being screwed up in the head with Michael Ball beating her so much! Poor girl helped him build his Rock & Republic and she deserves a huge chunk of it! AND Markus Klinko is helping her get HALF of it. This is obvious of who’s the bad and good guys. Who the hell care’s who’s gay anyways! The poor girl got beat and threatened since she know of all his illegal activities. Pretty F’ed up that Michael Ball himself arranged for her green card marriage with Kent Ross. Markus Klinko is really the savior of this SOAP OPERA. BALLS to the FLOOR!
Sounds like trouble in the air.
And now Michael Ball has a new problem. His other ex, Asha Kai just dumped him as well. Too bad, she was sort of cute in those nude shots from the B-day shoot huh? I like them.
Or did she get a bit too old and tired to get cheated on and screwed over? New love interests like Jamie from the Myspace page have popped up I hear? Calling her poor friend at 5 am?
Easy on the substances Michael. You are not born in 1968.
( Ok, he always has the girl from the nail salon left…she says he is the best f&%# in LA by LA nail salon standards, makes sense they would be on the same intellectual level ! )
Now Asha knows a lot of shit…..and she has been trying to build the house in Santa Monica. Lots of really pissed of ex’s here. Eloisa Carvahlo is not too happy either they say at Next.
Better keep handing out the little gift bags Michael, and don’t forget the parents of the very young ones.
And oh, I looked at People magazine just now. No longer on the hot bachelor list ? Was up with that? People magazine is catching up finally?
New information was filed today in the Klinko vs. Rock & Republic
case. A Memorandum of Law was filed supporting the case. In
addition, documents were filed with the court about Ball’s violent and
criminal past, arrest and sentencing records and use of false social
security numbers. An excerpt follows and the document is attached.
Excerpts from Klinko vs. Rock & Republic / Michael Ball
Introduced to the court 6/15/2007
23. In fact, as plead in the Complaint, prior to Michael Ball’s
threats and extortion against me, I was well aware of his violent
behavior, criminal history and psychological instability, as revealed
to me by Ms. Fernanda Romero. Compl., paras. 23-25. Such a history
and predisposition has been corroborated by numerous witnesses,
further substantiating my fear and apprehension regarding his threats,
as well as his motivation to silence my knowledge of the same.
Attached as Exhibit “C” is the Affidavit of Cynthia Pinot (“Pinot
Aff.”), which was also submitted in opposition to defendants’ motion
to strike. The car chase and brutal assault by Michael Ball against
Ms. Fernanda Romero, detailed in the Pinot Affidavit, has been further
corroborated by both Alex DeFelipe and Pascal Azoulay, the gentlemen
who were also assaulted and chased by Ball through the streets of Los
Angeles. Both DeFelipe and Azoulay have also corroborated Ball’s
pattern of intimidation against those that would expose such criminal
conduct.
24. In addition to the above, our ongoing investigation has also
corroborated various allegations made in the Complaint pertaining to
defendant Michael Ball’s motive to threaten and extort plaintiffs,
such as my knowledge of criminal activities, acts of violence, court
ordered psychiatric treatment, Ball’s own use of a false social
security number (which he presented to police upon his arrest and
sentencing in the matter attached), and evidence that at least three
different social security numbers were used by Fernanda Romero,
corroborating both Romero’s and Ball’s admission that Ball assisted in
obtaining the same. Two examples of the above are attached hereto as
Exhibit “D” (arrest and sentencing report; Solis v. Ford, L.A.
Superior Court, Case No. BC 228258).
EXCERPTS FROM PINOT AFFIDAVIT – MARKUS KLINKO VS ROCK & REPUBLIC / MICHAEL BALL
2. I write this affidavit to explain what I believe are clear motivations of defendant Michael Ball leading up to the claims made in this lawsuit.
Based upon my personal knowledge of Fernanda and Michael Ball, I am convinced that Michael Ball’s improper motivations caused the situation that Markus Klinko and his company are facing now. I firmly believe that the entire soap opera that was and is the relationship between Michael Ball and Fernanda directly lead to, contributed to and was the motivation behind the threats allegedly made by Mr. Ball against Markus Klinko and his company.
5. First and foremost, the sexually explicit photos that are in question in this lawsuit, were indeed shown to Michael Ball by Fernanda. I specifically recall Fernanda telling me that she showed them to Michael Ball, and that she was the one that let him see them.
Fernanda’s marriage to Kent Ross is common knowledge among all of our friends and associates. What is also common knowledge is that their marriage was arranged by Michael Ball for the sole purpose of gaining U.S. citizenship for Fernanda. No one doubts this as Fernanda made that very clear. In fact, Fernanda has never really lived with her “husband. Fernanda told me about Michael Ball’s help and his introduction to Kent Ross. Fernanda also explained to me how Kent Ross was even paid to marry her.
This information is likely something that Michael Ball would not want disclosed to anyone – let alone to plaintiff Markus Klinko, who was living with Fernanda and was in a very close, intimate relationship with her for all of 2006. I know that Fernanda would eventually tell Markus Klinko everything about her relationship with Michael Ball. Fernanda also had a violent and turbulent relationship with Michael Ball, leading to a police involvement that I personally witnessed (described below); something that Mr. Ball would likely not want to be disclosed either.
10. I have also become aware that Michael Ball did not know of Fernanda’s close relationship with Markus Klinko until after the Rock & Republic photo shoot with Mr. Klinko. With my knowledge of Mr. Ball, it is very likely that such a disclosure evoked a powerful motivation to keep both his violent history with Fernanda and complicity in her immigration status a secret.
11. I have witnessed Michael Ball’s frightening, violent and jealous behavior firsthand, along with Fernanda and two other friends. In this particular incident in June 2003, not only did Michael Ball physically assault two of my male friends and follow us in a horrific car chase through Santa Monica, Hollywood and Los Angeles, but when he caught up to us, he pulled Fernanda by the hair from our car and kicked her in a jealous rage. In this incident, police were called two times before they arrested him and lead him away in handcuffs.
22. I remained friends with Fernanda after that horrible night, right up until recently. Despite my total fear and repulsion for Michael Ball, she continued her “relationship with him, however strange. At a certain point, especially after the incidents leading up to this lawsuit, I could handle it no more.
23. I firmly believe, and respectfully submit, that such a horrific past clearly is a motivation for Michael Ball to attempt to silence Markus Klinko – and anyone who gets in his way.
What does Kent Ross and his sunset band have to say about Michael Ball and Rock & Republic and all this fake green card
marriage stuff between him and Ball’s ex Fernanda Romero? Michael Ball set the fraud marriage up to gain leverage over Romero and stop her from suing him for her well deserved half of Rock & Republic.
Kent Ross and Electric Uh-Oh mates could not have stated it in sweeter words. On YouTube they say:
Band:
We got a SUGAR DADDY.
Interviewer:
Beautiful, do you want to talk about your sugar daddy…?
Band:
All I will say is ….
ROCK & REPUBLIC…ROCK & REPUBLIC….
Oh lord! This soap opera keeps getting more interesting!!! Fernando Romero is spilling the truth to investigators on her FRAUD MARRIAGE to Kent Ross!! I can’t believe Michael Ball arranged that and Kent Ross’s girlfriend Gladys Otero must be pissed! Famous people aren’t innocent from what it seems…haha
just get on with your life victoria b. you have money from the spice girls bull shit. as for michael ball get off his nuts, its his company you trick. go kick rocks fake ass buster. ROCK & REPUBLIC is the bomb. and mike keep your pimp hand strong.————–STA.
Yes exactly! A pimp or a street hustler seems to be a very accurate comparison with Michael Ball.
Same idea. Controls and beats women and keeps the money. And throws them a
bone once in a while. This is all so true. Thanks for the insights Shawn Tracy.
Victoria Beckham is supposedly planning on suing the LA based premium denim fashion label Rock & Republic. She says that the company owes her more money than they have already paid her for promoting the label which she was associated with in the past.
Up to $100 million dollars is being sought by her and it looks like it’s going to be a real long legal battle. The ex – Spice girl has recently started her own line of clothing called DVB Style and is in talks to expand further into denim, the product which she promoted R&R so successfully with.
Here are some facts:
Michael Ball is being sued for extortion, assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, wrongful eviction and tortious interference, among other things.
Michael Ball has been involved in criminal activity and acts of violence.
It’s part of the public record, and the details of what he’s done will amaze you.
You can read about it here:
Los Angeles Superior Court, case number BC 228258
Superior Court of Santa Monica, case number 1SM02392
Supreme Court of the State of New York, case number 101063/07 and 662018/07
I’ve worked in the LA denim bizz for 15 years and I remember when Michael Ball was bouncing checks on folks with his lil’ tshirt company in North Hollywood called Motor. He was a struggling actor turned “designer” slash tough guy. It was obvious then that he was a nutcase who had been fondled into madness as a child. Years later he was bangin anyone and everyone who would walk through the door at R&R. I can’t tell you how many sewing contractors and assorted vendors have been screwed by Michael Ball-beard. Thats right, he wears a beard of human balls on his chin. Hopefully justice will prevail!
cool, a shrink has joined the blog. what other insights do you have about Ball and his twisted psychology? must have been pretty intense during those days in Van Nuys.
Jeans CEO Accused of Trying to Get in Employee’s Pants
08-27-2007
Rock and Republic clothing’s CEO and lead designer, Michael Ball, is being sued by a former employee for sexual harassment.
TMZ obtained the lawsuit, filed August 17 in Los Angeles County Superior Court, that claims in November of 2006, Nicole Baros interviewed with Ball to be his personal assistant. During the five-minute interview, Baros alleges Ball asked her if she “had a boyfriend.” The lawsuit claims that during her first month of employment, Ball made unwanted sexual advances towards her, such as “touching her hair, and continually staring at Baros’ breasts and butt,” and one point told her he wanted to “sleep with her.”
The lawsuit also alleges at the company Christmas party Ball “cornered Baros in a room and attempted to kiss her … then proceeded to stick his hand down plaintiff’s pants.” Later that month, she says she went to Ball’s home to have him sign company checks and he answered the door in his underwear. She then says he chased her “around his apartment, grabbed her and threw her on his bed.”
In the end, Baros claims she was n ot selected to go to Fashion Week in New York City, and was ! “let go and was told that there was not enough work for her.”
This is so funny! More and more people are realizing how horrible Rock & Republic is…..
Party girl Paris Hilton kicked off Monday night – which ended after 13 bottles of champagne – by “hosting” a charity event, though she wasn’t in a giving mood.
According to an insider, Hilton refused to be photographed at the Puck Building event with the AmFAR Rocks co-chairs from Rock & Republic, instead staying behind a velvet rope with her flack all night.
I find her thoroughly annoying. It is her arrogant sense of self importance…she is a silly little talentless trout who got lucky. A fashion designer now…about as much use to the world as an ice teapot maker.
Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 67108864 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 40 bytes) in /home/enugu27/public_html/wp-includes/taxonomy.php on line 2624
Follow on Twitter
Subscribe by RSS
24 Comments
Interesting, Victoria Beckham isnt the only one having problems with Rock & Republic. This suit between photographer Markus Klinko and Rock & Republic is even in the New York post at http://www.nypost.com/seven/01262007/news/nationalnews/fashion_passion_sextortion_nationalnews_dareh_gregorian_and_bill_hoffmann.htm and
http://www.nypost.com/seven/01272007/news/regionalnews/4_way_triangle_regionalnews_dareh_gregorian.htm
Theres an interview Michael Ball did about working with Markus, and it was pretty nice. Its on youtube at http://youtube.com/watch?v=2bsXaWdhHC8
Check out this lawsuit, what do you guys think about this?:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
——————————————————————–X
MARKUS KLINKO and MARKUS KLINKO
Index No.
PHOTOGRAPHY, INC., d/b/a MARKUS KLINKO & INDRANI PHOTOGRAPHY,
V
ERIFIED COMPLAINT
Plaintiff,
-against-
ROCK & REPUBLIC ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a ROCK & REPUBLIC JEANS and
MICHAEL BALL, individually,
Defendants.
———————————————————————X
Plaintiffs MARKUS KLINKO and MARKUS KLINKO PHOTOGRAPHY, INC.,
d/b/a MARKUS KLINKO & INDRANI PHOTOGRAPHY, by and through their
attorneys,
MELTZER LoPRESTI, LLP, as and for their complaint against Defendants
ROCK &
REPUBLIC ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a ROCK & REPUBLIC JEANS and MICHAEL
BALL, allege as follows:
NATURE OF ACTION
1. This action responds to a pattern of threats and extortion
perpetrated by defendant
Michael Ball (ìBallî), the CEO, founder and head designer for
defendant Rock & Republic
Enterprises, Inc. (ìRock & Republicî), a manufacturer of fashionable
denim jeans under the
brand name ìRock & Republicî.
2. Fueled by jealousies over an ex-fiancÈ that abandoned Ball and who
subsequently
entered into a long term romantic relationship with plaintiff Markus
Klinko (ìKlinkoî), and
seeking to protect himself from potentially damaging information
regarding his past, Ball
embarked on a crusade to intimidate Klinko personally and
professionally. Upon obtaining
possession of intimate e-mails and sexually explicit photos exchanged
by Klinko and BallÃs exfiancÈ,
Ball proceeded to threaten Klinko to ìwalk awayî from his ex-lover
and any monies
owed to plaintiffs, because if he didnÃt, Ball would use his ìpower
and influenceî in the fashion
industry, as well as the photos and e-mails, to publicly embarrass
and ruin Klinko personally and
professionally. BallÃs threat: ìyou donÃt want to fuck with meî.
3. In December 2006, Klinko, together with his business partner
Indrani Pal-
Chaudhuri (ìIndraniî) and their studio, Markus Klinko & Indrani
Photography (ìMKIPî), had
originally been hired by defendant Rock & Republic to shoot an
international advertising
campaign for their brand.
4. Klinko, a highly successful, internationally acclaimed, fashion/
celebrity
photographer who has become well known for his work with A-list
actors, musicians and models
in the entertainment industry such as Jennifer Lopez, Britney Spears,
Mariah Carey, Janet
Jackson, Beyonce, Lindsay Lohan and David Bowie, among many others,
as well as for his work
in major advertising campaigns and fashion magazines, was introduced
to Ball by BallÃs exfiancÈ
while she was in a romantic relationship with Klinko. However, upon
information and
belief, Ball was unaware of this relationship.
5. Thereafter, despite being admittedly extremely pleased by Klinko
and MKIPÃs
work and the obvious success of the photo shoot, instead, Ball later
sought to humiliate and
embarrass Klinko and MKIP by making unreasonable and nonsensical
demands. Ball followed
by then refusing to use any of plaintiffsà images, by refusing to use
Klinko and MKIP in any
further ad campaigns (as defendants had promised), and by refusing to
compensate plaintiffs
without any viable reason.
6. One week later, upon coming into possession of the aforesaid
sexually explicit
images and personal e-mails, Ball then proceeded to threaten Klinko,
claiming to be a ìbig shotî
in the industry (ìdo you know who I amî), and that Klinko would be
embarrassed, humiliated
and professionally ruined by this personal information and the
release of the photos if he didnÃt
simply ìwalk awayî from any of his claims against defendants or his
former lover, repeatedly
intimidating Klinko with such statements as ìdonÃt fuck with me or
youÃll regret itî, ìyou donÃt
want to fuck with meî and ìlet it go, or elseî.
7. At that time, BallÃs threats also included him assisting in the
filing of a
harassment claim against Klinko with local police and spending
whatever money it took for his
attorneys to pursue Klinko through representation of his ex-fiancÈ.
8. As alleged herein, in conjunction with the making of such threats,
Ball feigned the
act of ìprotectingî his former lover as if a ìknight in shining
armorî, while portraying Klinko as
a disgruntled boyfriend. However, numerous e-mails and communications
between both Klinko
and BallÃs ex-fiancÈ subsequent to their separation and prior to
BallÃs threats, belie such a
characterization. Rather, these communications support plaintiffsÃ
claims of BallÃs jealous and
vindictive motivation, as they detail numerous times a loving desire
by BallÃs ex-fiancÈ to
continue to remain in a relationship with Klinko, or in the least to
remain in communication with
him. In an e-mail to Klinko dated December 28, 2006, she elaborated:
ìListen [ ]now that you
met Michael you can understand why I got so traumatized.î
9. Defendant Ball has continued to act in bad faith through such
threats, and has
benefited by improperly retaining the fruits of plaintiffsà labor, by
preventing plaintiffs from
recovering what is rightfully theirs, by use of threats intended to
destroy KlinkoÃs personal life
and professional career and to embarrass and severely injure
plaintiffsà reputation and financial
interests. Threats of ruining someoneÃs career through extortion and
blackmail should not be
tolerated – and resorting to bully tactics in avoidance of proper
resolution through the judicial
system is simply unacceptable.
THE PARTIES
10. Plaintiff Markus Klinko (ìKlinkoî), is an individual and resident
of New York
County. Klinko is an internationally known, high-end fashion/
celebrity photographer, catering to
numerous well-known actors, musicians and models in the entertainment
industry, as well as
international advertising campaigns and magazines.
11. Plaintiff Markus Klinko Photography, Inc., d/b/a Markus Klinko &
Indrani
Photography (ìMKIPî), is a corporation duly organized under the laws
of the State of New
York, and maintains a principal place of business in the City, County
and State of New York.
MKIP is in the business of photographic and imaging services.
12. Upon information and belief, defendant Rock & Republic
Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a
Rock & Republic Jean (ìRock & Republicî), is a corporation organized
under the laws of the
State of California, with a principal office located at 3525 Eastham
Drive, Culver City,
California 90232. Rock & Republic is a manufacturer of, among other
things, denim jeans,
which are sold in New York.
13. Upon information and belief, Michael Ball (ìBallî), is a resident
of the State of
California and is the CEO and founder of defendant Rock & Republic.
VENUE
14. In accordance with Rule 503(a) of the New York Civil Practice Law
and Rules,
venue is appropriate in this Court.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
15. Plaintiffs maintain a well-known business in photography and
photographic
imaging, catering to a high-end fashion/celebrity clientele of
actors, musicians and models in the
entertainment industry, also creating images seen in international
advertising campaigns and
magazines.
16. Defendants Ball and Rock & Republic represent the brand ìRock &
Republicî, a
clothing line that primarily features fashionable denim jeans.
17. On or about November 22, 2006, defendants sought a high-end
photographer to
shoot their major advertising campaign for Spring 2007, to be
revealed at Fashion Week in New
York, February 2007.
18. At that time, defendant Klinko was romantically involved with
Fernanda Romero
(ìRomeroî), a soap opera actress and aspiring model. Romero
introduced Klinko to Ball, in an
apparent attempt to garner a position as featured model in the Rock &
Republic campaign.
19. Several years earlier, defendant Ball had been romantically
involved with
Romero, and had even proposed to her. The couple subsequently became
engaged.
20. Upon information and belief, after a tumultuous relationship in
which Ball had
several violent incidences with Romero, Romero left Ball and ended
the relationship.
21. Upon information and belief, at various times during 2005, Ball
assisted and/or
aided Romero in procuring a fraudulent marriage for immigration
purposes, and also assisted and
advised Romero in obtaining a false social security identification
card while utilizing two
different social security numbers.
22. In about January, 2006, Romero became romantically involved with
plaintiff
Klinko. Upon information and belief, this occurred despite BallÃs
attempts to woo Romero back
by buying her a new car during that same time.
23. During Romero and KlinkoÃs relationship, Romero would often
reveal to Klinko
highly confidential and intimate details about her relationship with
Ball, and at times she would
even broadcast phone conversations with Ball via speakerphone or by
placing the phone at full
volume.
24. On numerous occasions, Romero referred to sensitive matters
regarding their
prior relationship, such as instances of violence by Ball leading to
police involvement and
RomeroÃs complaints to the police, immigration fraud and his
complicity in her fraudulent
marriage and the procurement of false social security numbers, tapes
of their therapy sessions
and conversations regarding his sexuality.
25. Upon information and belief, KlinkoÃs acquired knowledge of such
accounts was
the partial motivation for Ball to eventually seek to silence and
extort Klinko.
26. In about November 2006, Romero introduced Klinko to Ball in an
apparent effort
to be featured in the Rock & Republic advertising campaign.
27. Upon information and belief, until that time, Romero had never
told Ball that she
was involved with Klinko for fear of not being awarded a model
contract with Rock & Republic.
28. Upon meeting, Ball represented that since defendants had
partnered with and/or
been involved in major campaigns with celebrity personalities such as
Victoria Beckham (ìPosh
Spiceî) and plans to feature Jessica Alba in an upcoming fashion
season, plaintiffs would
benefit from the added exposure of a full advertising campaign with
the Rock & Republic
brand.1
29. As defendants were aware, Klinko and MKIP demand a superior ìday
rateî in the
industry due to their status and impressive client roster.
Plaintiffsà images are known worldwide,
as they have produced many instantly recognizable photographs for A-
list celebrities, musicians
and models in the entertainment industry, such as Jennifer Lopez,
Britney Spears, Mariah Carey,
Beyonce, Lindsay Lohan, Mary J. Blige, Kate Winslet, Keanu Reeves,
David Bowie, among
others, as well as major advertising campaigns for highly visible
clients such as L’Oreal Paris,
Pepsi, Hugo Boss, Nike, Elizabeth Arden, Baby Phat, and many others.
Such images have also
appeared in well-known magazines such as Vanity Fair, V, GQ,
Interview, Arena and Playboy,
among others. (See http://www.markusklinko-indrani.com/photoGallery/ )
30. On or about December 5, 2006, the parties agreed that plaintiffs
would be retained
by defendants in relation to the advertising campaign for defendantsÃ
brand ìRock & Republicî
(hereinafter, ìthe Workî), on the following terms: (i) plaintiffs
would be guaranteed ìon page ad
creditî for their work; and (ii) plaintiffs were to be granted
exclusive rights to shoot future
campaigns for the brand. In return, plaintiffs agreed to: (a) waive
their session fee (which
consisted of a day rate of $ 30,000.00); (b) grant international
usage of images produced for one
year (valued at $ 30,000.00); and (c) provide digital post production
services at cost. Attached as
Exhibit ìAî is the partiesà agreement. As is standard, up front
expenses of the photo shoot were
to be paid prior to the shoot.
31. At this time, by the explicit instruction of Ball, Romero was not
to be used in the
1 Unknown to Klinko, defendants and Victoria Beckham had parted ways,
and upon
photo shoot because ìshe cheated on meî, as Ball stated before both
his and plaintiffsà staff.
32. Pursuant to said agreement, on about December 14, 2007,
plaintiffs duly
performed the required services in connection with the Work.
33. The photo shoot was a great success, and defendant Ball openly
praised the
plaintiffsà work, which he also declared on camera in a video
produced for the campaign. As
stated by Ball:
ìI just wanted to say working with Markus and Indrani was
amazing . . . they’re
the future of fashion, I mean I’m really stoked as a young company to
be working
with them and I think this is the beginning of greatness . . .
honestly. It was quite
a shoot, and . . . you guys will see it, it’ll be on the pages, of
March . . .
I’d be honest I look forward to work with them again and again. I
mean honestly .
. . this is a relationship and a partnership that is going to create
some really
amazing, amazing things, and I look forward to it. It’s going to be
really fucking
cool . . .î.
34. By about December 21, 2007, plaintiffs had already prepared seven
(7) composed
ad proposals for presentation to defendants.
35. On that date, following plaintiffsà submission of images for
consideration,
defendant Ball suddenly contacted plaintiffs and for no reason,
demanded that plaintiffs
immediately turn over all images taken – even test images. Such a
demand under these
circumstances is unheard of and is not standard in the industry.
36. Despite BallÃs unreasonable demand, plaintiffs additionally
provided several
dozen images to defendants on December 22 and December 29, 2006.
37. At this time, plaintiffs further explained that the edited
selection of images was
ready for review, however, defendant Ball simply refused to
communicate at all with plaintiffs
information and belief, has recently sued defendants.
about the proposed image selection.
38. Thereafter, defendants notified plaintiffsà agent that they were
not only refusing to
use any of plaintiffsà images, but were refusing to use Klinko and
MKIP in any further ad
campaigns (as promised).
39. Defendants also notified plaintiffsà agent and Klinko directly
that they were
refusing to compensate plaintiffs at all, without any viable reason.
40. Upon information and belief, on or about January 15, 2007,
defendant Ball came
into possession and/or viewed highly personal, sexually explicit
photos and e-mails, shared
between Klinko and Romero.
41. On January 18, 2007, defendant Ball contacted KlinkoÃs attorney
by telephone,
stating he had viewed the sexually explicit photographs and e-mails.
42. In that conversation, Ball threatened that if Klinko contacted or
pursued Romero
any further, KlinkoÃs reputation would be damaged by the exposure of
such information.
43. On about January 21, 2007, Klinko contacted Ball by telephone,
whereupon Ball
proceeded to threaten Klinko that if he did not ìback offî and simply
ìwalk awayî from any
claims he had against defendants or Romero, Ball would expend all of
his power and influence to
embarrass, humiliate and professionally ruin Klinko by exposure of
this personal information.
44. On that phone conversation, defendant Ball repeatedly threatened
and intimidated
Klinko with statements such as ìdonÃt fuck with me or youÃll regret
itî, ìlet it go, or elseî, ìyou
donÃt want to fuck with meî and ìdonÃt fuck with me on a personal
levelî.
45. BallÃs threats also included that he would assist Romero in
filing a bogus
harassment claim with local police and spend ìany amount of moneyî on
attorneys for Romero
to pursue Klinko, in addition to causing crippling financial loss to
plaintiffs.
46. On that phone conversation, Ball threatened and intimated that if
Klinko did not
ìback offî and ìwalk awayî, he would use all of his influence and
connections in the industry to
prevent Klinko and MKIP from earning money with other clients, and
would openly and publicly
refuse to use plaintiffsà work, thus causing further embarrassment
and humiliation.
47. On that phone conversation, Ball also threatened to force Klinko
to expend great
sums of money via legal battles and attorneysà fees, that would
essentially put Klinko out of
business.
48. In conjunction with making such threats, Ball feigned the act of
ìprotectingî
Romero. However, upon information and belief, Ball is simply
protecting his own interests and
using the opportunity of RomeroÃs romantic relationship with Klinko,
and the sexually explicit
photos and personal e-mails, to avoid his own liability and to strike
out maliciously against
Klinko.
49. Upon communicating with defendant Ball on January 21, 2007, and
in fear and
apprehension over the aforesaid threats received from Ball, Klinko
decided to forgo pursing Ball,
Rock & Republic and/or Romero for monies owed and services performed.
AS AND FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
AGAINST MICHAEL BALL
(Extortion)
50. Plaintiffs incorporate paragraphs ì1î through ì49î, above by
reference.
51. That defendant Ball did threaten and intimidate plaintiff Klinko
that if he did not
relinquish his rights to property, namely money plaintiffs are
entitled to, and if Klinko did not
cease all communications with Romero, he would expose personal
documents and photographs
and publicize the same, subjecting Klinko to contempt, ridicule or
embarrassment.
52. That defendant Ball did threaten and intimidate plaintiff Klinko
that if he did not
relinquish his rights to property, namely money plaintiffs are
entitled to, and if Klinko did not
cease all communications with Romero, he would assist in accusing
Klinko of a crime and/or
cause criminal charges to be instituted against him.
53. That defendant Ball did threaten and intimidate plaintiff Klinko
that if he did not
relinquish his rights to property, namely money plaintiffs are
entitled to, and if Klinko did not
cease all communications with Romero, he would use his influence in
the fashion industry and
spend any amount of money to defame, bad mouth and harm Klinko
personally and
professionally, in the fashion and entertainment industry.
54. That such wrongful actions would cause serious injury to
plaintiffsà reputations
and business interests.
55. That by reason of defendant BallÃs threats, defendants improperly
obtained
property, namely, services, money and images to which they are not
entitled.
56. By reason of defendant BallÃs attempted extortion, plaintiffs are
entitled to
declaratory and injunctive relief as well as compensatory and
punitive damages in an amount to
be determined at trial.
AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
AGAINST MICHAEL BALL
(Tortious Interference with Prospective Business Relations)
57. Plaintiffs incorporate paragraphs ì1î through ì56î, above by
reference.
58. Plaintiffsà public image and relations with clients and
advertisers, agents, models,
make-up artists, hair stylists, and those employed in the
entertainment industry are crucial to
their business.
59. Defendant BallÃs wrongful actions, as described in the foregoing
paragraphs, and
which include the willful breach of the Rock & Republic advertising
campaign contract without
reason, exhibit an intentional, malicious and unjustified
interference with plaintiffsà current and
future business relations with said clients and advertisers, and
those employed in the
entertainment industry.
60. Defendant BallÃs actions, as described in the foregoing
paragraphs, were improper
and beyond the scope of his position as CEO of defendant Rock &
Republic, such that these
actions served to interfere with plaintiffsà current and future
business relations with Rock &
Republic.
61. Defendant BallÃs interference with plaintiffsà business relations
was undertaken
with the sole purpose of harassing plaintiffs and/or with dishonest,
unfair or improper means.
62. By reason of the foregoing, and as a direct and proximate result
of defendant
BallÃs conduct, plaintiffs are entitled to declaratory and injunctive
relief as well as compensatory
and punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial.
AS AND FOR A THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
AGAINST MICHAEL BALL
(Prima Facie Tort)
63. Plaintiffs incorporate paragraphs ì1î through ì62î, above by
reference.
64. Defendant BallÃs wrongful conduct was completely unjustified and
was intended
solely to inflict substantial harm against plaintiffs.
65. By reason of the foregoing, plaintiffs are entitled to
declaratory and injunctive
relief as well as compensatory and punitive damages in an amount to
be determined at trial.
AS AND FOR A FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
AGAINST MICHAEL BALL
(Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)
66. Plaintiffs incorporate paragraphs ì1î through ì65î, above by
reference.
67. Defendant BallÃs wrongful conduct, as described in the foregoing
paragraphs,
constitutes extreme and outrageous conduct and behavior.
68. Defendant Ball acted with malice, and with the intent to cause
severe emotional
distress to plaintiff Klinko and/or in deliberate disregard of the
high probability that severe
emotional distress to Klinko would result.
69. Defendant Ball has maliciously embarked on a course of conduct
intended to
cause Klinko to suffer mental and emotional distress, tension and
anxiety.
70. Plaintiff Klinko has suffered and will continue to suffer great
mental strain and
anguish and severe emotional distress.
71. By reason of the foregoing and as a direct and proximate result
of defendant
BallÃs conduct, plaintiff Klinko is entitled to compensatory and
punitive damages against
defendant Ball in an amount to be determined at trial.
AS AND FOR A FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION
AGAINST DEFENDANT ROCK & REPUBLIC
(Breach of Contract)
72. Plaintiffs incorporate paragraphs ì1î through ì71î, above by
reference.
73. To date, despite due demand, defendant Rock & Republic has
refused to pay
plaintiffs for their services.
74. That defendant has willfully breached its agreement with
plaintiffs by failing to
pay plaintiffs for their services duly rendered.
75. That defendant has willfully breached its agreement with
plaintiffs by refusing to
use plaintiffsà images and provide plaintiffs with credit
acknowledgment of the same.
76. That defendant has willfully breached its agreement with
plaintiffs by failing to
provide plaintiffs exclusivity for their services as ìpartnersî with
regard to future advertising
campaigns.
77. That as a result of defendantÃs breach of the partiesà agreement,
plaintiffs have
been damaged in a sum to be determined at trial, but believed to be
no less than Five Hundred
Thousand Dollars ($ 500,000.00).
AS AND FOR A SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION
AGAINST DEFENDANT ROCK & REPUBLIC
(Unjust Enrichment)
78. Plaintiffs incorporate paragraphs ì1î through ì77î, above by
reference.
79. Under the doctrine of quantum meruit, defendant Rock & Republic
has been
unjustly enriched by receiving the benefit of the services provided
by the plaintiffs in a sum to be
determined at trial, but believed to be an amount no less than Two
Hundred Thousand Dollars ($
200,000.00).
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand judgment against the Defendants as follows:
a. Declaring that the acts and practices complained of herein are in
violation of the
laws of the State of New York;
b. Enjoining and permanently restraining these violations;
c. Directing Defendants to pay compensatory and punitive damages to
Plaintiffs in
an amount to be proven at trial;
d. Awarding Plaintiffs costs, disbursements and reasonable attorneysÃ
fees; and
e. Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
Dated: New York, New York
January 23, 2007
Respectfully submitted,
MELTZER LoPRESTI, LLP
By: /s/ _________________________
Anthony A. LoPresti
30 Broad Street, 37th Floor
New York, New York 10004
(212) 425-0551
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
IT SEEMS THAT THE PHOTOGRAPHER MARKUS KLINKO IT’S OBSSESED WITH THIS GIRL AND HE IS SO F&%$@wING INSECURE!!!
MOVE ON MAN….
HE IS SO TALENTED AND IT’S A SHAME HE IS DOING THIS.
BEST WISHES.
RUST T
just get over it, it seems Mr Ball has this shit clocked so this guy sould back of and let it be. all this over some women. markus go home,and ball get new girl, she sound’s cheap anyway,give her the finger and buy a new one. thats my take on this, im out peace.
I think She is too Hot for this old man..
All of this sound like he is lying.
Move on.
Peace
Not so sure, Miracle. I mean, think about it for just a minute.
A few short years from now, this guy will still bed a half a dozen 18 year old hotties every month. Wanna bet?
She (andy gayrumor-spreading fiona banana look alike..oooopss!!!) will have had their 5th lipo -sure it’s cheap in Tijuana!- and after 30, which is pretty soon cause 23 she ain’t (Caras check your facts!)it all
will smell like rotten fish. Actually it does already.
Greetings
Mari
BUT MARCUS WAS SOO F&%$@wING SELFISH!!!!
HOW COULD HE SLEEP WITH ALL THESE GIRLS AND DO THE THREESOMES AND EVERYTHING???? THAT IS NOT RIGHT NO???
RUST T
wait a second! markus is soo gay!! i know my bf told me.
markus shoots all the music stuff and he has worked with
n sync and lance bass…no way he ever slept with a girl.
THIS MARKUS GUY IS VERY GAYYY!
LOOK AT HIS MY SPACE WHY SOMEONE SO INSECURE ABOUT HIS SEXUALITY WOULD PUT ALL THOSE GIRL PIC’S?
ITS OBVIOUS RIGHT?
Who blames her being screwed up in the head with Michael Ball beating her so much! Poor girl helped him build his Rock & Republic and she deserves a huge chunk of it! AND Markus Klinko is helping her get HALF of it. This is obvious of who’s the bad and good guys. Who the hell care’s who’s gay anyways! The poor girl got beat and threatened since she know of all his illegal activities. Pretty F’ed up that Michael Ball himself arranged for her green card marriage with Kent Ross. Markus Klinko is really the savior of this SOAP OPERA. BALLS to the FLOOR!
Sounds like trouble in the air.
And now Michael Ball has a new problem. His other ex, Asha Kai just dumped him as well. Too bad, she was sort of cute in those nude shots from the B-day shoot huh? I like them.
Or did she get a bit too old and tired to get cheated on and screwed over? New love interests like Jamie from the Myspace page have popped up I hear? Calling her poor friend at 5 am?
Easy on the substances Michael. You are not born in 1968.
( Ok, he always has the girl from the nail salon left…she says he is the best f&%# in LA by LA nail salon standards, makes sense they would be on the same intellectual level ! )
Now Asha knows a lot of shit…..and she has been trying to build the house in Santa Monica. Lots of really pissed of ex’s here. Eloisa Carvahlo is not too happy either they say at Next.
Better keep handing out the little gift bags Michael, and don’t forget the parents of the very young ones.
And oh, I looked at People magazine just now. No longer on the hot bachelor list ? Was up with that? People magazine is catching up finally?
New information was filed today in the Klinko vs. Rock & Republic
case. A Memorandum of Law was filed supporting the case. In
addition, documents were filed with the court about Ball’s violent and
criminal past, arrest and sentencing records and use of false social
security numbers. An excerpt follows and the document is attached.
Excerpts from Klinko vs. Rock & Republic / Michael Ball
Introduced to the court 6/15/2007
23. In fact, as plead in the Complaint, prior to Michael Ball’s
threats and extortion against me, I was well aware of his violent
behavior, criminal history and psychological instability, as revealed
to me by Ms. Fernanda Romero. Compl., paras. 23-25. Such a history
and predisposition has been corroborated by numerous witnesses,
further substantiating my fear and apprehension regarding his threats,
as well as his motivation to silence my knowledge of the same.
Attached as Exhibit “C” is the Affidavit of Cynthia Pinot (“Pinot
Aff.”), which was also submitted in opposition to defendants’ motion
to strike. The car chase and brutal assault by Michael Ball against
Ms. Fernanda Romero, detailed in the Pinot Affidavit, has been further
corroborated by both Alex DeFelipe and Pascal Azoulay, the gentlemen
who were also assaulted and chased by Ball through the streets of Los
Angeles. Both DeFelipe and Azoulay have also corroborated Ball’s
pattern of intimidation against those that would expose such criminal
conduct.
24. In addition to the above, our ongoing investigation has also
corroborated various allegations made in the Complaint pertaining to
defendant Michael Ball’s motive to threaten and extort plaintiffs,
such as my knowledge of criminal activities, acts of violence, court
ordered psychiatric treatment, Ball’s own use of a false social
security number (which he presented to police upon his arrest and
sentencing in the matter attached), and evidence that at least three
different social security numbers were used by Fernanda Romero,
corroborating both Romero’s and Ball’s admission that Ball assisted in
obtaining the same. Two examples of the above are attached hereto as
Exhibit “D” (arrest and sentencing report; Solis v. Ford, L.A.
Superior Court, Case No. BC 228258).
EXCERPTS FROM PINOT AFFIDAVIT – MARKUS KLINKO VS ROCK & REPUBLIC / MICHAEL BALL
2. I write this affidavit to explain what I believe are clear motivations of defendant Michael Ball leading up to the claims made in this lawsuit.
Based upon my personal knowledge of Fernanda and Michael Ball, I am convinced that Michael Ball’s improper motivations caused the situation that Markus Klinko and his company are facing now. I firmly believe that the entire soap opera that was and is the relationship between Michael Ball and Fernanda directly lead to, contributed to and was the motivation behind the threats allegedly made by Mr. Ball against Markus Klinko and his company.
5. First and foremost, the sexually explicit photos that are in question in this lawsuit, were indeed shown to Michael Ball by Fernanda. I specifically recall Fernanda telling me that she showed them to Michael Ball, and that she was the one that let him see them.
Fernanda’s marriage to Kent Ross is common knowledge among all of our friends and associates. What is also common knowledge is that their marriage was arranged by Michael Ball for the sole purpose of gaining U.S. citizenship for Fernanda. No one doubts this as Fernanda made that very clear. In fact, Fernanda has never really lived with her “husband. Fernanda told me about Michael Ball’s help and his introduction to Kent Ross. Fernanda also explained to me how Kent Ross was even paid to marry her.
This information is likely something that Michael Ball would not want disclosed to anyone – let alone to plaintiff Markus Klinko, who was living with Fernanda and was in a very close, intimate relationship with her for all of 2006. I know that Fernanda would eventually tell Markus Klinko everything about her relationship with Michael Ball. Fernanda also had a violent and turbulent relationship with Michael Ball, leading to a police involvement that I personally witnessed (described below); something that Mr. Ball would likely not want to be disclosed either.
10. I have also become aware that Michael Ball did not know of Fernanda’s close relationship with Markus Klinko until after the Rock & Republic photo shoot with Mr. Klinko. With my knowledge of Mr. Ball, it is very likely that such a disclosure evoked a powerful motivation to keep both his violent history with Fernanda and complicity in her immigration status a secret.
11. I have witnessed Michael Ball’s frightening, violent and jealous behavior firsthand, along with Fernanda and two other friends. In this particular incident in June 2003, not only did Michael Ball physically assault two of my male friends and follow us in a horrific car chase through Santa Monica, Hollywood and Los Angeles, but when he caught up to us, he pulled Fernanda by the hair from our car and kicked her in a jealous rage. In this incident, police were called two times before they arrested him and lead him away in handcuffs.
22. I remained friends with Fernanda after that horrible night, right up until recently. Despite my total fear and repulsion for Michael Ball, she continued her “relationship with him, however strange. At a certain point, especially after the incidents leading up to this lawsuit, I could handle it no more.
23. I firmly believe, and respectfully submit, that such a horrific past clearly is a motivation for Michael Ball to attempt to silence Markus Klinko – and anyone who gets in his way.
What does Kent Ross and his sunset band have to say about Michael Ball and Rock & Republic and all this fake green card
marriage stuff between him and Ball’s ex Fernanda Romero? Michael Ball set the fraud marriage up to gain leverage over Romero and stop her from suing him for her well deserved half of Rock & Republic.
Kent Ross and Electric Uh-Oh mates could not have stated it in sweeter words. On YouTube they say:
Band:
We got a SUGAR DADDY.
Interviewer:
Beautiful, do you want to talk about your sugar daddy…?
Band:
All I will say is ….
ROCK & REPUBLIC…ROCK & REPUBLIC….
Bright young men they are indeed.
Oh lord! This soap opera keeps getting more interesting!!! Fernando Romero is spilling the truth to investigators on her FRAUD MARRIAGE to Kent Ross!! I can’t believe Michael Ball arranged that and Kent Ross’s girlfriend Gladys Otero must be pissed! Famous people aren’t innocent from what it seems…haha
NO one BUY Rock & Republic Clothing!!!! MICHAEL BALL SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
JESSICA ALBA, VICTORIA BECKHAM, and FERNANDA ROMERO need to SHUT THIS CASE and get their MILLIONS from the piece of SHIT!!!!
just get on with your life victoria b. you have money from the spice girls bull shit. as for michael ball get off his nuts, its his company you trick. go kick rocks fake ass buster. ROCK & REPUBLIC is the bomb. and mike keep your pimp hand strong.————–STA.
Yes exactly! A pimp or a street hustler seems to be a very accurate comparison with Michael Ball.
Same idea. Controls and beats women and keeps the money. And throws them a
bone once in a while. This is all so true. Thanks for the insights Shawn Tracy.
Victoria Beckham is supposedly planning on suing the LA based premium denim fashion label Rock & Republic. She says that the company owes her more money than they have already paid her for promoting the label which she was associated with in the past.
Up to $100 million dollars is being sought by her and it looks like it’s going to be a real long legal battle. The ex – Spice girl has recently started her own line of clothing called DVB Style and is in talks to expand further into denim, the product which she promoted R&R so successfully with.
Here are some facts:
Michael Ball is being sued for extortion, assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, wrongful eviction and tortious interference, among other things.
Michael Ball has been involved in criminal activity and acts of violence.
It’s part of the public record, and the details of what he’s done will amaze you.
You can read about it here:
Los Angeles Superior Court, case number BC 228258
Superior Court of Santa Monica, case number 1SM02392
Supreme Court of the State of New York, case number 101063/07 and 662018/07
I’ve worked in the LA denim bizz for 15 years and I remember when Michael Ball was bouncing checks on folks with his lil’ tshirt company in North Hollywood called Motor. He was a struggling actor turned “designer” slash tough guy. It was obvious then that he was a nutcase who had been fondled into madness as a child. Years later he was bangin anyone and everyone who would walk through the door at R&R. I can’t tell you how many sewing contractors and assorted vendors have been screwed by Michael Ball-beard. Thats right, he wears a beard of human balls on his chin. Hopefully justice will prevail!
cool, a shrink has joined the blog. what other insights do you have about Ball and his twisted psychology? must have been pretty intense during those days in Van Nuys.
Jeans CEO Accused of Trying to Get in Employee’s Pants
08-27-2007
Rock and Republic clothing’s CEO and lead designer, Michael Ball, is being sued by a former employee for sexual harassment.
TMZ obtained the lawsuit, filed August 17 in Los Angeles County Superior Court, that claims in November of 2006, Nicole Baros interviewed with Ball to be his personal assistant. During the five-minute interview, Baros alleges Ball asked her if she “had a boyfriend.” The lawsuit claims that during her first month of employment, Ball made unwanted sexual advances towards her, such as “touching her hair, and continually staring at Baros’ breasts and butt,” and one point told her he wanted to “sleep with her.”
The lawsuit also alleges at the company Christmas party Ball “cornered Baros in a room and attempted to kiss her … then proceeded to stick his hand down plaintiff’s pants.” Later that month, she says she went to Ball’s home to have him sign company checks and he answered the door in his underwear. She then says he chased her “around his apartment, grabbed her and threw her on his bed.”
In the end, Baros claims she was n ot selected to go to Fashion Week in New York City, and was ! “let go and was told that there was not enough work for her.”
This is so funny! More and more people are realizing how horrible Rock & Republic is…..
Party girl Paris Hilton kicked off Monday night – which ended after 13 bottles of champagne – by “hosting” a charity event, though she wasn’t in a giving mood.
According to an insider, Hilton refused to be photographed at the Puck Building event with the AmFAR Rocks co-chairs from Rock & Republic, instead staying behind a velvet rope with her flack all night.
I find her thoroughly annoying. It is her arrogant sense of self importance…she is a silly little talentless trout who got lucky. A fashion designer now…about as much use to the world as an ice teapot maker.